Information Technology Consulting Firm

The results are in!  Techserve Alliance and Inverno released the results of the first of its kind study of IT Staffing firms, clients and candidates.  This is the first study of its kind to examine the flexible IT workforce from three distinct perspectives: clients, candidates and staffing firms. The findings, based on the responses of more than 700 survey participants, provide an in depth analysis of the state of the IT staffing industry.  The survey was conducted online between June 11, 2012 and October 4, 2012.  In the next few posts, I will be sharing some interesting points from the survey. 
 

This first point is from the candidate perspective and mirrors our own recent experience with a C# candidate.  Almost 1/3 of IT professionals found their most recent position in two weeks or less.  Most candidates, (84%) accepted a position within 3 months.  This means if you are hiring and you have a very qualified candidate presented, you have to move fast or you run the risk of losing out on the talent.
 

How do you know if the person is qualified or not?  One way is to work with a reputable IT Staffing firm.  You can find reputable firms by searching here.
 

We recently had a situation where one of our candidates was working with more than one firm.  This is not too un-common; I have touched on this subject before in this post here.  The other firm did not do a very good job of presenting this person.  They probably slapped their logo on his resume and sent it off to the client along with a number of others that “looked good”.  The candidate did not hear anything from the other firm. 

We, on the other hand, took time to understand this person and used our Now you know^TM assessment to get an un-biased gauge of his skills.  We found him to be very strong in the skills that several of our clients were looking for.  We talked with him on where we would like to present him and that’s when we learned of a potential conflict.  A quick call to the client confirmed the client was working with another firm as well and if he was submitted by them, they would get the credit.  BTW, what’s his name?

Fortunately, we are members of Techserve Alliance and industry best practices in this case call for the candidate to decide who should represent him at the client.  We have a Right to represent form that we had the candidate fill out for this client.  That way there is no conflict. 

The moral of the story is this: If you are a candidate, make sure the firms you are working with are doing a good job of representing you and know where they are sending your resume.  We recommend that you work with no more than 2 firms.  If there is a conflict, then you should decide who is doing a better job of representing you.

If you are on the hiring side, and hiring for IT, then hire an IT staffing firm, not someone that does several types of jobs.  Don’t let them sell you on how deep their database is, according to the latest Techserve Alliance operating metrics report, less that 30% of the positions are filled from their own proprietary database.  (Ours is over 50% because we are focused on IT in the Cincinnati and Dayton areas).  We all have access to the same internet resources.  If all you needed was a stack of resumes that has been poorly scrutinized, most staff augmentation firms would be fine.  But you don't have time to cull through 20 resumes to find the person with the real experience.  Isn't that what you're paying that staffing firm to do?

I am often asked for advice on BA Career paths, Certifications, What technique to use, templates, tools, and so on.. It seems to me that everyone is looking for that “One size fits all” solution on how to perform the role of the BA. The one path up the BA Career Ladder, the one way to go about getting your certification, should I learn DOORS, RequisitePro or Composer?

One thing that I have learned in my many years of doing BA work is that there is no “One size fits all” way of delivering the BA role. Your BA approach will be different depending on the type of project you are involved in. It will differ for a COTS project vs. Capability Gap Analysis. Your approach and tasks that you perform will be different if you are doing enhancements to an ERP system vs. a Vendor Assessment. The techniques you use would be different as well as the templates you may use.

Robin Grace handled the template issue in her article on BA Times entitled “It’s Time for Template Zombies to Die”. Often BAs looking for a template to use will get one from a friend that works for a much larger firm, or a new hire BA brings one with them from a larger firm. The smaller firm uses the template as is, even though there are sections that do not pertain to the type of BA work that the firm does. It may be at times Management will ask “It took you three days to write a two-page document?” Sometimes the response is to make the document 10 pages, and all you have done is added a lot of fluff with no meat. Often, that fluff ends up in the template for the document. Instead of adding fluff, remind Management, “it is more than just writing a document; there is quite a bit of analysis done to make that document right”.  Often people go by what they see and forget about the work done behind the scenes to get to the deliverable. When you do come across a template to use remember this is just a guideline, it can be changed to fit your current situation. Feel free to remove, add or reword sections of the template to make it usable for your task.

I have written many times about the BA Career path. In my last article, I surmised that there are as many paths up the BA Career Ladder as there are people willing to forge them. Getting career advice from those that have gone before you is great and can help you forge ahead, but it does not mean there is one and only one way to climb the career ladder. Advice is helpful, but you are still in charge of your career.  

So in any given situation, instead of looking for the “correct” way to handle the situation, do what any good BA would do. Identify and consider all possible solutions, expand your knowledge so you can assess all possible solutions, identify the risks of each solution and select the best possible solution given the knowledge you have at the time. Remember, the “One size fits all” solution does not exist.

One of my fellow Techserve Alliance members sent out an article that I thought was pretty interesting.  You can view the original article here.  It reinforced the idea that local talent is important.  STAR BASE, Inc. has always focused on Cincinnati and Dayton IT talent, so I felt validated.  Some of you may think I’m crazy for talking about a Talent Battle while unemployment is still so high.  I don’t think so, because some IT talent is already hard to find.  Here are some key points from the article in winning the up coming Talent Battle.

1. Eliminate Past Biases.  Many companies don’t consider candidates who they have interviewed but declined previously. There is often a strong bias against them, as in, “We interviewed that guy in January, and he wasn’t any good …” Given that most companies don’t have highly refined selection processes; this is an error in strategy.  Most companies’ selection process is very subjective.  For companies to win, they will need to revisit local talent who they may have interviewed previously for other roles.
2. Don’t Overweight Experience and Technical Skills.  Most companies routinely overweight years of experience and technical skills through the interview process.  A question that needs to be asked is, “Is it possible for someone with five years of experience to outperform someone with ten years of experience? How is that possible?” Smart IT service providers will help their customers select on the portfolio of attributes that drive success in a job, being careful to not overweight less-predictive candidate attributes such as years of experience. Doing so will increase the candidate pool that is available locally.
3. Map your Internal Talent.  Now more than ever, developing internal talent is a smart strategy, as it also correlates to reduced attrition. So for those jobs that can be sourced internally, organizations will be well served by doing so, provided it supports the local search strategy.
4. Measure the Opportunity Cost of Key Vacancies.  Understand the business case for paying relocation. There could be a good argument for what jobs might warrant a rich pot of relocation dollars. This will put you ahead of the game.
5. Focus on the Local. Now would be a good time to look at your suppliers and choose ones that are local and focus on the local.  (I think I may know of one…)
6. Outsmart Your Competitors.  Smart companies will quickly recognize that improving the value package offered to employees to attract and keep more local talent carries far greater ROI than buying someone out of their underwater mortgage, or letting a key role in the organization sit vacant.
 7. Keep Your Best:  As always, the best local talent to attract and recruit are the strong performers who are already working for your company. But most companies have cut bonuses, reduced merit increases, and kept job promotions to a minimum in order to control costs during recent challenging economic times.

Now is a good time to think about your Talent Strategy.  Don’t get caught short in the up coming Talent Battle.

 

On of the big things all application development people know (and I guess business development people know as well), is how their department is treated by management. This battle has been raging since companies decided to have an IT department. The perfect company would have an IT department that supports the business goals and objectives, and can scale and change quickly. I can hear some application development folks laughter already. It can happen. Management needs to let the IT department make the decisions on the software, hardware and infrastructure. IT must understand the business needs, and managements' objectives. The business needs to articulate their needs, and help IT understand the business concerns. In balance, all departments fulfill their roles and the business grows. I have seen some companies that at least understand this principle, and try to implement it, but most companies have one side dominating the other. I will highlight the major factors for the Great IT Battle.

Management treats IT as a cost center – That is correct only if you are an accounting firm. IT brings great value to any organization by streamlining your business processes, which gives you your competitive advantage. I think that more than justifies the cost.

Business “owns” the IT department – This is very common where the business was mature before IT was around. Management came from the business, and doesn't understand that IT is a separate department. IT cannot scale and maintain their infrastructure, so once every 5 – 7 years there is a project like the Big Dig. If you like complex, over budget projects, continue in this manner.

IT “owns” the business - This is  common with organizations that see growth when they added IT. Usually this is caused by management thinking that IT solves all of the problems. IT supports the business. You still need a business plan and a vision.

Political battles between the three – This is the crux of the issue. Management usually comes from the business side, so when in a political battle, IT loses. Unless management views IT as the “magic bullet”, then IT wins. All political battles boil down to my next point:

Risk aversion - an executive at one of my clients pointed this out to me. All of the executives are the winners of many years of political battles. Any decision made is with the idea that they are near retirement, and will not make any drastic change that could hurt their position.

There are a lot of other factors that nuance these scenarios, so your view to the struggle is unique. We at STAR BASE would like to know where you are in this struggle by taking a brief (17 questions on 1 page) survey. STAR BASE can help your organization call a truce to the Great IT wars.

You have probably heard your parents or grand-parents talk about when they were younger and how they had to walk to school, up hill both ways.  When they shared this story with you it was to prepare you for times when things weren’t so easy and to provide you with their knowledge and advice from their hard earned experience. I wish that someone would have shared the list below with me earlier in my career.  It might have saved me a few grey hairs and sleepless nights.  I have to admit, I have been guilty of a couple of these in the past, but that’s why it’s called experience.

1. Bill for time not worked.  This will be the quickest way to end up out of a consulting gig. Make sure you bill the client only for the time you actually work. This can be tricky if your clients are friends. When you go to a job like this, you know there will be a period of time spent socializing, especially when you first arrive. Don't bill for this time. Start the billing period when you start working.  Sometimes clients will have celebrations during the day.  If you don’t want to appear anti-social, by not going, just don’t bill.  If there are any questions, ask the account manager to find out. If you are the account manager, ask your client manager at one of your one to one meetings if it’s ok to bill.  Some client’s have a culture where that is part of the expectation.

2. Negotiate rates and make deals with the client.  If you work for a consulting firm, you know there are channels for clients to go though to make requests..  Most firms have some sort of account manager to handle those issues.  Direct the client to the account manager.  I had one consultant that actually went so far as to look in the client’s AP system to see how much we were getting paid and then wanted to negotiate a higher rate with the client.  This particular action did not end well for the consultant and he has not been able to be considered for other assignments in this client even when his skill set was ideal.  Never, ever work out a side deal or moonlight with a client this can comprise your integrity and jeopardize the trust between  you, the consulting company and inevitably the client.

3. Act like a prima donna.  Yes, you’re good, that’s why you have been hired. I actually heard a consultant tell the client that their employees were stupid.  Hello? You are there to serve those employees.  You don’t know what kind of constraints they have had to work with.  Hind sight is always 20-20.  Its always far better to politely make suggestions. You may find out your brilliant idea was considered previously and there was a very valid reason for it not being implemented.  It’s much better to NOT have egg on your face or your foot in your mouth.

4. Miscommunicate or undercommunicate when engaged at a client I believe that the client should know what is going on with their project.  Many times I have had to be the bearer of bad news.  I also like weekly status reports to let the client know what I have worked on and what I’m planning on doing.  If at all possible I like to let them know a percent complete.  Years ago, I heard another consultant tell the client he was “unit testing”.  The client assumed that meant he had all the functionality done and was testing.  The reality was he had about 10% of the functionality done and was testing just that one small piece.  When the truth came out, it was not pretty.

Tomorrow I will finish off the last 3 sins.
To be continued……

I wrote in my last post about looking forward to using my phone in England. Well, I am back (It was wonderful) to tell all of my application development people and friends about my experience. It was a bit of a struggle to get my phone unlocked. I had just unlocked my G1, and when I purchased my new phone, my provider said that they only allow a phone number to be unlocked once every 90 days no exceptions. I understand that, as unlocked phones are very desirable on the open market, but I want to use my phone. After not taking "no" for an answer several times, a workaround was found. Once landing in England, finding a phone provider was easy. Unlike the US, you have to purchase your phone at full price, and then select a provider. Sure, you don’t get a cheap new phone, but you aren’t saddled with a poorly operating service provider either. My first stop was at an O2 store by my Tube (London underground) station. They were very helpful, even though they couldn’t provide me with a plan. They suggested I go to T-Mobile, and even gave me directions! I would like to know from my application development friends if they ever had helpful service from their phone provider. I went to T-Mobile, and got my SIM card. This is a pay as you go card. I got the card and put 5 pounds for use. Since my phone is not available in the UK yet, I got to show it off. I also got the free international rate of 5 pence (about 8 cents) a minute to the US. My roaming charges would have cost me $1.49 a minute. The data plan was 1 pound a day for unlimited surfing at about 10 MPS. That was much better than $15 per Megabyte usage. How difficult was it to switch networks? I just swapped out SIM cards and it was ready to go. I was able to use Google maps (with turn by turn walking directions), get tube updates, and find places on the Internet. It was the fastest my phone had ever worked. I had used up my initial 5 pounds, so I went to Tesco (like CVS or Walgreens) and added another 5 pounds there. Super easy! Now, if I go back, I have everything I need to use my phone. On my return trip I swapped my SIM card back to my original, and everything worked from home again. I wished the US had this as the competition was on consumer services, and better features and not trying to make it difficult to use your phone or change services.

I was reading this article and as a Cincinnati based IT consulting firm owner, found it interesting.  Social networks are influencing our everyday lives more and more each day.  This research was conducted by Don Bulmer from SAP and Vanessa DiMauro  According to them, there were six key findings:

1. Professional decision-making is becoming more social - enter the era of Social Media Peer Groups (SMPG).
Professionals want to be collaborative in the decision-cycle but not be marketed or sold to online; however online marketing is a preferred activity by companies.
2. The big three have emerged as leading professional networks: LinkedIn, Facebook & Twitter.
The convergence of Internet, mobile, and social media has taken significant shape as professionals rely on anywhere access to information, relationships and networks.
3. Professional networks are emerging as decision-support tools.
Decision-makers are broadening reach to gather information especially among active users.
4. Professionals trust online information almost as much as information gotten from in-person.
Information obtained from offline networks still have highest levels of trust with slight advantage over online (offline: 92% - combined strongly/somewhat trust; online: 83% combined strongly/somewhat trust).
5. Reliance on web-based professional networks and online communities has increased significantly over the past 3 years.
Three quarters of respondents rely on professional networks to support business decisions
6. Social Media use patterns are not pre-determined by age or organizational affiliation.
Younger (20-35) and older professionals (55+) are more active users of social tools than middle aged professionals.
There are more people collaborating outside their company wall than within their organizational intranet.

After reading this, a Bad Company tune came to mind, “Run with the Pack”.  There is certainly safety in numbers.  My question is this:  If everyone is doing the same thing, are they giving up any competitive advantages?

 

I recently read an article about the state of the IBM “i” and the amount of complaining by IBM application development and business partner folk. I know several RPG application development folk, and it sounds familiar. That made me think about my Java Application development and career. Are there things to complain about, and uncertainty about the future? Yes, but there are 2 reasons why the Java community is in a better place; the business model and the community. Before the IBMers call for a holy war, I said COMMUNITY! I am not talking about the strengths or weaknesses of the hardware or software. The business model for IBM is that they make the hardware and software, and partner for the sales and service. I think that is a viable model until IBM competes in the sales and services with their partners. If a lead is brought in by a small partner, they are awarded by giving the business to someone bigger. This sets up a confrontational relationship between IBM, the big partners, and the little partners. IBM can also decide whether or not you are worthy to be a partner. Why does this affect the software application development team? Because most consulting firm are selling SERVICES not HARDWARE. If they are not seeing business because of political fighting, they don't have to sell it. There are viable options on other platforms, where interference does not happen. IBM never fostered a community, they created a hierarchy with themselves as the head.

Certainly Sun has done some things that made myself and others unhappy. Besides, complaining, we actively pushed to remove barriers in our path. We do have an open source Java. Is there a IBM community that can work with RPG to make it work for them? I also think its about scale and timing. It's not like IBM software developers have their own AS/400 at their home. It's easy for me to create and use nearly any kind of application at my home in Cincinnati, and pretty cheaply. It makes it fun to tell non-technical people about my application development. Nobody but accountants want to hear about accounting programs. Java, and newer languages have grown up with the Internet. I have friends from all over the globe that have similar interests. If I have a problem, I can go online to a forum, friend, or web page to find what I need. I can read and write blogs to voice my opinion (like now). These things are not ingrained in the Legacy community, and in fact, have been actively campaigned against. It is my belief that any software, hardware, or service will die when there is no vocal community to support it.

Come on, come on, come on, come on now Touch me, babe!  Can't you see that I am not afraid? ....... Yea, I have been listening to The Doors again.  See the complete lyrics here.  Actually we are trying to decide how, when and what to do marketing wise or as we say internally, how many times to “touch” the client.  Even a Cincinnati based Information Technology Firm is not immune to the FUD Factor.  What’s an IT Consulting Service firm to do?

One of the things that has stuck with me from my marketing class at MIT  is when the professor said that the quickest way to burn through a million dollars and have nothing to show for it, was to start marketing and advertising. We certainly need to be marketing, but if companies’ are not in a position to buy, are the marketing dollars wasted? 

Having been around for 19 years, this is the 3rd economic downturn we have experienced.  We have come out of each one a little wiser and a little stronger.  We have been positioning to leap frog our competitors during this one.  We have seen an up tick in activity, just like everyone else.  This is the 64 dollar question:  Is now the time to spend the marketing dollars?

Since today I have more questions than answers, I invite you to leave comments on How?, When?, How often?  What means?  You would like to be marketed to.  Comments will be posted following this blog, so contribute and check back to see what others think.  

 

A couple of weeks ago, I made the trek to Columbus and attended the Ohio chapter meeting of TechServe Alliance of which STAR BASE, Inc. is a member.  In talking with other owners and corporate executives, everyone is pretty much saying the same thing: “We are seeing more sales activity, just no commitments.”   Seems like everyone involved with Ohio Information Technology firms is in the same boat.  In Cincinnati, things might not be quite as bad as Columbus because there is less state government work.

So why is there a lack of commitment?  There could be many reasons, but it all boils down to what I call the FUD Factor.   Never heard of the FUD Factor?  We would not be a real IT Consulting firm if we couldn’t use a TLA (three letter acronym) and it’s not what you’re thinking!  FUD is short for Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. 

When the FUD factor is high, people tend not to make commitments, changes or decisions.  Doing nothing seems like the safest choice.  A high FUD factor equals RISK and as a society, we have become very risk adverse.   When the FUD factor is low, decisions are much easier to make, less risky. 

With the economy down and so much uncertainty, the FUD factor is definitely high.  So is doing nothing really a good choice?  Things tend to move in cycles or patterns, it is the way of the world... Losers become winners. Winners become losers. Day yields to night; nights divide the days; summer gives way to winter. Life goes on...always as it always was...but never the same.

Will you be ready?
 

The Cincinnati market is known for being conservative when it comes to using software. Most application development people I know would say that big software, from the big firms, either three lettered companies, or their name ending in “soft”, are the only code found in shops. There is the occasional open source item here and there, but usually in smaller shops. Why is that? Well, some firms don’t create their custom application development, they just enhance out of the box software. They need a vendor to yell at and fix things when it breaks, because their staff can’t fix the code, or don’t have access to it. For many firms, it is better to pay a vendor for support than to maintain it themselves. As long as you can point to somebody, it’s ok. Some firms actively fear that open source means that everyone will have their intellectual property somehow. They fail to realize that it is the same proprietary code that everyone uses too. Since, you have the source code, you can see if there is a backdoor coded in the application, something you can’t do with proprietary code.

With these fears aside, many firms, even in Cincinnati, are looking to use open source solutions for their issues. Certainly many are using the free (as in beer) code to save costs. I hope though that some firms will see how this free (as in liberty) also helps their business. It’s a tough call whether to purchase a pre-made business process package (I am looking at you SAP), or to roll your own. I think the best of both worlds would be to use an open source application, and to enhance it. It is a popular misconception that you MUST contribute code, or that you can’t change the code. You can create your own code for use; you can’t sell the application with YOUR enhancements as YOUR NEW application. There is some legal wrangling, yes, but the bottom line is that you have application development teams, so use them. Your best business plan is to use your process as a competitive advantage, not to shoehorn your process into software that all of your competitors use. I think the goal is to beat them, not join them.
The best thing to do is to give your application development team a couple of old boxes to play with, and let them do some research on applications that can save your money, and are flexible enough to work with your processes. You may end up with an inexpensive system, and get that application that outperforms your competitors.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2a8TRSgzZY

Check out this video, it’s so dead on.  Many of us in the IT staffing industry have dealt with this first hand.  “I can get <fill in IT skill> resources for $20 an hour less from XYZ".  Companies’ sometimes act like they are buying a commodity product like copier paper, rather than skilled IT consultants. 

No manger would ever dream of going to one of their employees and saying, I can get Bob to do your job for $10,000 less per year, yet it’s becoming more prevalent in the IT staffing business. 

One of the huge issues facing our industry is the use of H1-B IT consultants.  Our leaders in Washington are looking legislation specifically targeting IT consulting firms that use H1-B consultants to limit our ability to do so.  This is in the interest of saving American jobs.  Unfortunately, the bill currently being debated does not limit multi-national companies, so only the smaller companies will be hurt. 
 

I would love to use local IT consultants for all of our engagements, but the price pressure dictates we do things we normally wouldn’t chose to do.   But then again, we’re really just hurting ourselves.

Organizations that build strong value-driven cultures frequently achieve high performance.  The values that are developed must touch every department in the organization or the overall operation will fall short of its targeted goals.

As an IT consulting firm in Cincinnati, we see many different approaches from many different companies and it is the “out-of-the-box thinkers that seem to continually apply lateral thought process on a continual basis and always stay a few steps ahead of their competition.

One would think that IT departments would observe and learn from this but way too often they do not pay attention to the business drivers of the organization and continue to stay with the same IT infrastructure year in and year out and resist change on any level.

There are those that would argue that “if it isn’t broke don’t fix it” and I agree to a point but I believe that if IT professionals are going to contribute to building a strong value-driven culture that works to achieve the business goals of the organization they are going to have to look at new approaches that may enhance the very work they are held accountable for.

Being responsible for business development for our Cincinnati IT consulting firm, over the past couple of weeks I have approached several clients and potential clients with some new value propositions.  Many do not want to talk about them, nor are some even curious on what they are.  Everyone has a full plate and little capacity for a new application development services, IT training or IT consulting project.

However, here is a question that I have for these individuals.  If it is true that information technology changes every fifteen to eighteen months, how can the IT systems and enterprise IT applications that you have had in place for the last three to five years continue to be relevant or simply as efficient as they could be?  Do you not owe it to yourself to at least listen to what an IT consulting firm here in Cincinnati has to offer?  Perhaps that IT consultant has significant experience with a solution that can make a difference but you are unaware of it because you are resistant to change and everything is running 'smoothly'.  I can understand your hesitation but what if the new solution could greatly improve your IT infrastructure, decrease costs, fuel improved productivity or more effectively balance your IT staffing needs?   Wouldn’t it behoove you to at least listen?
 

Just about every aspect of the world today is in transition and the IT services industry is no exception to this statement.  Professional IT services personnel must come to terms with the fact that the skills that they have developed in the past are valuable but they are not enough to sustain long-term growth in the IT field of today.

Technology touches every aspect of our lives and large enterprise organizations are dependent on technology to even operate.  The face of information technology consulting services has changed as well because being technical is not enough to meet the required skill sets of organizations.

Gartner has reported that the IT skills from yesterday are not enough to sustain an IT professional today.  The needs of business have changed and the IT professional of today needs to understand business and the business goals of their organization.  Everything and everyone needs to not only understand the big picture, they need to know how to flourish in it.

Gone are the days where IT departments were an island unto themselves.  The enterprise of today is an integrated machine that touches every part of the organization.  If an IT manager proposes a certain type of technology they must also be able to come up with the business case for their proposal.  Organizations need to understand and justify IT projects and not do them simply because the IT department suggests them.

This approach to business justification and accountability has also crossed over into the information technology staffing industry as well.  It is a fact that organizations will continue to need outside technical help but this technical help will have to be business savvy as well - there are no more shortcuts.  Just being technical is not enough anymore; an IT staffing person must appreciate the fact that they are placed in a position to do a job, but they must also understand the pressure that organization is dealing with when it comes to ensuring that information technology meets the needs of the company.  Firms are seeking staffers that can operate and function on both sides of the line, business and technology.

If one commits to this exciting world of information technology consulting services they must also commit to a pledge of life-long learning.  To not do so will not meet the needs of today’s business world and will place that person on the outside looking in and wondering why they did not get the position they sought.